How Would You Use Scholarship Money Essay Examples?

West Virginia Politics Discussion Post and Response - 550 Words

West Virginia Politics Discussion Post and Response (Essay Sample) Content: Name of Student:Name of Professor:Course Details:Date of Submission:West Virginia Politics Discussion Post and ResponsePartisan election is a system of judicial selection in which voters elect judges for an initial term of office, after which time they are eligible to run for re-election. Those seeking office run as candidates of political parties. A nonpartisan election on the other hand is a lack of affiliation with a political party. In my opinion, reforms on the partisan election system will go a long way to restore publics faith in justice. Corruption in any system damages public trust. About 87% of the general public believes corruption negatively affects politics and elections (White n.d). Most voters are cynical in their expectations, and often feel that corruption scandals are rife in the system.Reforms will also improve civic participation through voter connection to candidates and instillation of ownership by voters to the system. It will be better for the general public to be involved especially in the nomination of candidates so that in the event of the candidates failure they will not blame the system. This will also ensure that a candidate is elected on merits of their justice credibility and not by their social status.However, in addition to reforming the Partisan election system, the publics attitude greatly needs to change and focus on people who serve justice and not personal interests. Owing to that, the public should not focus on campaign strategies and financial muscle of aspirants, as a self-serving candidate can stage a flawless campaign strategy leading to the downfall of an otherwise good candidate who would serve the peoples common interest.Although changing the partisan system seems to be a major focus in trying to restore the publics faith in the judicial system, it is not the only way. A better and a long-term solution would be if people with character ran for, or were appointed on merit, to the bench. This would re quire a substantial exercise of self-control on the part of the person appointing the justice to the bench. For better results yet, it should be autonomous without the pressure from friends because they fancy a particular person, family ties or whatever ties the person may have to the candidates. The common fallacy of leaving the errors to be corrected by the people who come after should be completely wiped out. The next person says that the justice will be served by the next, the public forfeits its justice by electing another justice procrastinator into the bench, and so it becomes an endless circle of injustices.There should be a law eliminating official ...

The Writer Who Became a Skeptic and Developed the Essay Form

The Writer Who Became a Skeptic and Developed the Essay FormMichael Garcia is the author of a book called Writer Who Became a Skeptic and Developed the Essay Form. This has been an eye-opening experience for me. I had no clue that I could write anything!The introduction of Michael Garcia's book caught my attention. He talks about how he began to question his beliefs on writing in a skeptical manner, when he realized that there were people out there who believed they were good writers, but weren't very good. In this way, he was able to become a skeptic and develop the essay form.As we know, the writer's essay form came from students at Harvard and Yale. I don't know if this was you, but I think you should look into this if you want to learn more about your writing abilities. This is the best way to become a skeptic. Once you understand what it means to be a skeptic, you will understand why you cannot achieve the kind of success you would like.I have spent many hours reading this book by Michael Garcia. His motivation was to become a skeptic and develop the essay form. He wanted to test himself.He really succeeded and he used this in his writing to show skepticism of the students. He was able to show his skepticism by writing about their abilities. It helped him realize that he couldn't be a good writer, but he knew he wasn't a bad writer.I have spent many years in my life as a skeptic and I am still searching for the meaning behind this. I believe that there is a bigger meaning to this than just being a skeptic. We all need to develop the essay form and put our skepticism into a form that is useful to us.For me, being a skeptic meant being able to judge the value of things. Once I realize this, I am able to help others who ask me what I do. This is one of the secrets to becoming a skeptic, to put your skeptical attitude into a form that can help others.The writer who became a skeptic and developed the essay form has brought me a great deal of understanding. If y ou want to develop your skepticism, this book may help you.